Exploration of the ethical dilemmas surrounding telephone follow-up clinics in ENT









Wootton. R. Recent advances: telemedicine. BMJ 2001;323(7312):557-60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7312.557

Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D. Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. CMAJ 2001;165(6):765-71.

Iseli MA, Kunz R, Blozik E. Instruments to assess patient satisfaction after teleconsultation and triage: a systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence 2014;8:893-907. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S56160

Lattimer V, George S. Nurse telephone triage in out-of-hours primary care: a pilot study. Primary Care Management 1996;6(5):3-6.

Bunn F, Byrne G, Kendall S. The effects of telephone consultation and triage on healthcare use and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55(521):956-61.

Christensen MB, Olesen F. Out of hours service in Denmark: evaluation five years after reform. BMJ 1998;316:1502-05. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7143.1502.

Dale J, Crouch R, Lloyd D. Primary care: nurse-led telephone triage and advice out of hours. Nurse Stand 1998;12(47):41-45.

Marsh GN, Horne RA. Channing DM. A study in telephone advice in managing out-of-hours calls. J R Coll Gen Pract 1987;37:301-304.

Sooby. P, Kirkland. P. Use of nurse-led telephone follow-up as a sole method of assessing patients after nasal surgery. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015;4(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u208386.w3311.

Murthy P, McKerrow WS. Nasal septal surgery: is routine follow up necessary? J Laryngol Otol 1995;109:320-4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100130026

Cukurova I, Cetinkaya EA, Mercan GC, Demirhan E. Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method. Acta Otolaryngol Ital 2012;32(2):111-14.

Walikar BN, Rashinkar SM, Watwe MV, Anees F, Kakkeri S. A comparative study of septoplasty with or without nasal packing. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;63(3):247-48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0141-x

Saharia PS, Sinha D. Septoplasty can change the shape of the nose. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;65(2):220-25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0330-7

Siegel NS, Gliklich RE, Taghizadeh F, Chang Y. Outcomes of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122(2):228-32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70244-0

Samad I, Stevens HE, Maloney A. The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol 1992;21(2):88-91.

Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM. et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130(3):283-90. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2003.12.004

Uppal S, Lee C, Mielcarek M, et al A. A comparison of patient satisfaction with conventional and nurse-led outpatient follow-up after grommet insertion. Auris Nasus Larynx 2004;31(1):23-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2003.07.009

Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ 1994;309(6948):184-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6948.184

Hewitt H, Gafaranga J, McKinstry B. Comparison of face-to-face and telephone consultations in primary care: qualitative analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2010;60(574):201-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X501831

Sokol D, Car J. Patient confidentiality and telephone consultations: time for a password. J Med Ethics 2006;32(12):688-89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.014415

Nolan F. (2001). Speaker identification evidence: its forms, limitations, and roles. In proceedings of the conference ‘Law and Language: Prospect and Retrospect’, Levi, Finnish Lapland.

Patel H, Patel M, Car J. Telephone consultations in general practice: areas for improvement. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2005;11:265–266. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633054471876

Ingham T. (2015). The evaluation of a telephone follow up clinic following uncomplicated nasal septoplasty. Unpublished manuscript.

Gov.uk (2003) ‘Confidentiality: NHS Code of Practice.’Pg 7-45. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/confidentiality-nhs-code-of-practice. (Accessed on 15/04/2016).

Sokol D, J Car. Protecting patient confidentiality in telephone consultations in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56(526):384-85.

Bloom JD, Kaplan SE, Bleier BS, Goldstein SA. Septoplasty complications: avoidance and management. Otolaryngol Clin 2009;42(3):463-81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2009.04.011

Gov.uk (1997) ‘The New NHS’ Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-new-nhs. (Accessed on 15/04/2016).

Lattimer V, George S, Thompson F, et al. Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out-of-hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. The South Wiltshire Out of Hours Project (SWOOP) Group. BMJ.1998;317:1054-59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1054

Uppal S, Nadig S, Mielcarek MW, et al. Patient satisfaction with conventional and nurse-led telephone follow-up after nasal septal surgery. Int J Clin Pract 2003;57(9):835-9.

Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S. et al. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 2002;6(32):1-244. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta6320

Linder-Pelz S, Struening E. The multidimensionality of patient satisfaction with a clinic visit. J Community Health. 1985;10(1):42-54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321358

Terry NP. Cyber-malpractice: legal exposure for cyber-medicine. American Journal of Law and Medicine 1999;25:327-66.

Spielberg AR. On call and online: socio-historical, legal and ethical implications of e-mail for the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1998;280:1353-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.15.1353