What is the most effective imaging modality to detect abdominal aortic aneurysms in a national screening programme?


Abdominal aortic aneurysm







Eckstein HH, Böckler D, Flessenkämper I, Schmitz-Rixen T, Debus S, Lang W. Ultrasonographic screening for the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 2009;106(41):657-63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2009.0657

National Health Service. NHS Abdominal Aortic Screening Programme: about us. 2011 (cited 25 November 2011). Available from: http://aaa.screening.nhs.uk/aboutus

Earnshaw JJ, Shaw E, Whyman MR, Poskitt KR, Heather BP. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men. Br Med J 2004;328(7448):1122-4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1122

Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, et al. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Eng J Med 2002;346(19):1437-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012573

National Health Service. Programme Appraisal Criteria. 2011 (cited 13 December 2011). Available from: http://www.screening.nhs.uk/criteria

British Heart Foundation. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. 2008 (cited 13 December 2011). Available from: http://www.bhf.org.uk/idoc.ashx?docid=f6657a6e-d1c7-485d-aaae-77e5868c6309&version=-1

Colledge NR, Walker BR, Ralston SH, eds. Davidson’s Principles & Practice of Medicine. 21st ed. Churchill Livingston (Elsevier). 2010

Lindholt JS, Norman PE. Meta-analysis of postoperative mortality after elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms detected by screening. Br J Surg 2011;98(5):619-22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7464

US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2005;142(3):198-202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-142-3-200502010-00011

Hong H, Yang Y, Liu B, Cai W. Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysm: the present and the future. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2010;8(6):808-19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2174/157016110793563898

Sprouse LR 2nd, Meier GH 3rd, LeSar CJ, et al. Comparison of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements obtained with ultrasound and computed tomography: is there a difference? J Vasc Surg 2003;38(3):466-71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00367-7

Wilmink AB, Forshaw M, Quick CR, Hubbard CS, Day NE. Accuracy of serial screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms by ultrasound. J Med Screen 2002;9(3):125-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/jms.9.3.125

Aarts NJ, Schurink GW, Schultze Kool LJ, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm measurements for endovascular repair: intra- and interobserver variability of CT measurements. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999;18(6):475-80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.1999.0883.

Shakibaie F, Hall JC, Norman PE. Indications for operative management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. ANZ J Surg 2004;74(6):470-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03033.x

Davies HE, Wathen CG, Gleeson FV. The risks of radiation exposure related to diagnostic imaging and how to minimise them. Br Med J 2011;342:d947. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d947

Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(22):2078-86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427

Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW. Preliminary ten year results from a randomised single centre mass screening trial for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;32(6):608-14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.06.008

Hoffmann B, Bessman ES, Um P, Ding R, McCarthy ML. Successful sonographic visualisation of the abdominal aorta differs significantly among a diverse group of credentialed emergency department providers. Emerg Med J 2011;28(6):472-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2009.086462

Hunink MG, Gazelle GS. CT screening: a trade-off of risks, benefits, and costs. J Clin Invest 2003;111(11):1612-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI18842

Definition of observer variation. 2011 (cited 10 December 2011). Available from: http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=8056

Wanhainen A, Bergqvist D, Björck M. Measuring the abdominal aorta with ultrasonography and computed tomography – difference and variability. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;24(5):428-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2002.1748

Beales L, Wolstenhulme S, Evans JA, West R, Scott DJ. Reproducibility of ultrasound measurement of the abdominal aorta. Br J Surg 2011;98(11):1517-25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7628

National Health Service. Quality Standards and Service Objectives. 2009 (cited 26 November 2011). Available from: http://www.vascularsociety.org.uk/library/aaascreening/doc_download/35-developing-an-aaa-screeningprogramme-service-objectives-and-qa-standards-sept-2009.html

National Health Service. Essential Elements in Developing an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Screening and Surveillance Programme. 2010 (cited 30 November 2011). Available from: http://www.vascularsociety.org.uk/library/aaa-screening/doc_download/94-developing-an-aaa-screening-programme-sops-and-workbook-may-2010.html

Hartshorne TC, McCollum CN, Earnshaw JJ, Morris J, Nasim A. Ultrasound measurement of aortic diameter in a national screening programme. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;42(2):195-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.02.030

Thapar A, Cheal D, Hopkins T, et al. Internal or external wall diameter for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010;92(6):503-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1308/003588410X12699663903430

Hangiandreou NJ. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in US. Radiographics 2003;23(4):1019-33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.234035034

Badger SA, Arya N, Loan W, Soong CV. Evaluation of angiography as the sole imaging study for the proximal aortic neck prior to EVAR. Ulster Med J 2009;78(3):166-70