Is expectant management the best option for women delivering a macrosomic baby? A review of the current literature

Keywords

Obstetrics
Birthweight
Shoulder dystocia
Childbirth

Abstract

 

 

 

https://doi.org/10.48037/mbmj.v7i4.156

References

Bahar AM. Risk factors and fetal outcome in cases of shoulder dystocia compared with normal deliveries of a similar birthweight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103(9):868-72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09904.x

Modanlou HD, Komatsu G, Dorchester W, Freeman RK, Bosu SK. Large-for-gestational-age neonates: anthropometric reasons for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;60(4):417-23.

Henriksen T. The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87(2):134-45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340801899289

Kumarasiri S, Wanigasekara R, Wahalawatta L, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight formulae to predict actual birthweight after 34 weeks: prospective validation study. Ceylon Med J. 2013;58(3):116-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v58i3.6104

Jolly MC, Sebire NJ, Harris JP, Regan L, Robinson S. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111(1):9-14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00154-4

Cheng YW, Sparks TN, Laros RK Jr., Nicholson JM, Caughey AB. Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery? BJOG 2012;119(4):402-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03248.x

NICE. Induction of Labour - Clinical Guideline 70. 2008

Mulik V, Usha Kiran TS, Bethal J, Bhal PS. The outcome of macrosomic fetuses in a low risk primigravid population. Int J Gynaecol Obst. 2003;80(1):15-22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00332-6

Ecker JL, Greenberg JA, Norwitz ER, Nadel AS, Repke JT. Birth weight as a predictor of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(5 Pt 1):643-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00007-0

NICE. Caesarean Section Guideline 132. 2011 11. Available from: http://www.ectopic.org.uk/patients/treatment/expectant-management/. Accessed 04/01/2014

Culligan PJ, Myers JA, Goldberg RP, et al. Elective cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence and brachial plexus injuries associated with macrosomia—a decision analysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(1):19-28; discussion. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1203-3

Sadeh-Mestechkin D, Walfisch A, Shachar R, et al. Suspected macrosomia? Better not tell. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(3):225-30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0566-y

Navti OB, Ndumbe FM, Konje JC. The peri-partum management of pregnancies with macrosomic babies weighing > or =4, 500g at a tertiary University Hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27(3):267-70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610701195074

Bailey C, Kalu E. Fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic mothers: antenatal diagnosis and delivery outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29(3):206-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610902743763

Rouse DJ, Owen J, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. JAMA. 1996;276(18):1480-6.

Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Obstetricians’ personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet 1996;347(9000):544. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91176-9

McGurgan P, Coulter-Smith S, O’Donovan PJ. A national confidential survey of obstetrician’s personal preferences regarding mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;97(1):17-19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00423-7